Aldo Costa vs Eric Krieg --BhaskaraWheel

tec--

--9/2 ---------------------- 7hand ------ k7 ------- 3-galactic

is this early Rosch?
 Gravity power generator based on fluid-air displacement SAMPLE TEST 2
Infinity SAV
103K subscribers
474,508 views  Jun 26, 2016
Gravity power generator based on fluid-air displacement

Learn more at https://infinitysav.com/
Email us to info@infinitysav.com

©2019 INFINITY SAV CO., LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Infinity SAV & the Infinity SAV logo are trademarks of INFINITY SAV CO., LTD., a company registered in the Republic of Korea.

47x russian thread in comments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Zenn0VD2Bo&lc=Ugh1-Fz5H62Ea3gCoAEC


RGP Homes
RGP Homes
3 years ago
I designed and released this 35 years ago..I was a hot tub designer. It never worked..the idea is also one of the very first perpetual motion ideas from the 1700s. The amount of force it takes to displace water is equal to its buoyancy. No gain
37
Primodernious
Primodernious
3 years ago
yes but not to the distance of travel. if you multiply the distance times the displaced volume the energy is bigger than just the displaced volume. if you had a mile of distance of displaced volume of travel, the energy required to fill the volume would be very small compare to the energy released by the distance of travel. its true that the pressure on the bottom of the water is higher than the top but the combined force of distance till beats the required energy to fill the contained.
7
Black turbine
Black turbine
3 years ago
 @Primodernious  not really but ok
5
Josh Hayl
Josh Hayl
3 years ago
To: RGP Homes,
🔵 SOoooooooo........... you're calling this inventor a liar and claiming that his device doesn't work?
2
immrnoidall
immrnoidall
3 years ago
convection generator.
immrnoidall
immrnoidall
3 years ago
a lie involves intent. but the guy explained why it won't work. think for a minute here. if it worked ,they would be everyplace. there is no way it would have been overlooked by everyone on the planet with a brain.
3
Ryan Griffith
Ryan Griffith
2 years ago
 @Primodernious  No it does not. It takes more pressure to add something to a high pressure environment. You could only recover what you inputted.
4
Hagoro Mo
Hagoro Mo
2 years ago
 @Primodernious   A mile tank filled with water ?! lol well the pressure at the bottom of the tank will increase by making it taller, right ?
1
W Monk
W Monk
2 years ago
RGP Homes

How high was your column?
RGP Homes
RGP Homes
2 years ago
Ok...the mistake i made was assuming the air bubble, ie displaced water, is the same size at bottom of tank. It isn't..water pressure cuts it in half ever 3 meters. So the deeper you  go, the less upward potential. Plus the friction of the machine plus the resistance of the dynamo and wire etc. I spent thousands and years on it.
2
RGP Homes
RGP Homes
2 years ago
 @Primodernious  i thought so too, but if it moved 5 feet..and it had to refill one container...it would have only 5 feet of motion, to generate enough power ti pump that air 1 mile down... the force required is always more than the total of even a mile of containers.
2
Novikov Оleksandr


RGP Homes
RGP Homes
2 years ago
 @Josh Hayl  no.  But as shown it cannot work.
1
RGP Homes
RGP Homes
2 years ago
I looked at video again...note all the wasted energy-air bubbles coming from bottom...no way its real. No real overunity design would waste all that kinetic energy.
1
J W
J W
2 years ago
 @immrnoidall  doubt it. We have new materials every year
J. S
J. S
1 year ago
 @J W  i just thought of this idea today  decide to do some research and found this video . i drew up a design for it with at 3000 feet the buckets are collapsible to decrease drag on the downward side at 3000feet the air buckets would require 900psi roughly over come the water pressure . i was thinking it could just wave pump generator or a wind turbine to generate the pressure needed to make this efficient but I  don't think its ultimately a price effective solution .
1
David Smithers
David Smithers
10 months ago
 @J. S  thought the same , what if you used pressure solenoids , but large scale ocean and have use of currents
J. S
J. S
10 months ago
 @David Smithers  friction is enormous and it is a bad idea.  If the goal is power production geo thermal is the best solution we have
immrnoidall
immrnoidall
8 months ago
 @J W  Thanks for your meaningless reply.
Joe Hajjar
Joe Hajjar
6 months ago
What about free fall can u get some  energy out of it
Tesla Free energy
Tesla Free energy
6 months ago
Используй вихревую насадку на клмпрессоре-форсунку Шаубергера, тогда пузыри будут легко задуваться. У Рош она стоит 20 тыс долларов, поэтому можно взять насадку используемую для аэрации бассейнов!
Tesla Free energy
Tesla Free energy
6 months ago
 @immrnoidall  это запрещённый генератор, нефтяное лобби не допустит в массу
GTA-6
GTA-6
3 months ago
 @RGP Homes  couldn't this be paired with solar. air pump
Another Account
Another Account
2 months ago
 @immrnoidall  The logic of "If it worked then it would be everywhere" is flawed SEVERELY.

That would be like saying "If spaceships work then we would already be living on mars" technology is both excitingly fast and extremely slow.
immrnoidall
immrnoidall
2 months ago
 @Another Account   yup. exactly like space travel and building a civilization on another planet that has zero resourses.
Zzz
Zzz
2 months ago
Hmu
immrnoidall
immrnoidall
2 months ago
Actually,  if starting with two equal forces, the addition of friction points, like every link in the chain,  is a loss. total of a loss.




R13
R13
4 years ago
The maximum amount of energy you can extract from the buoyancy of one bubble is going to be equal to the energy it took to pump the bubble in.
6
T.M.W. A.S.
T.M.W. A.S.
4 years ago
Not really, just make the thing taller so that there are more air locked cups, making more lift to make more torque on the motor... more power... boom
2
scienceminded
scienceminded
4 years ago
 @T.M.W. A.S.  Merely making it taller causes the pressure at the lowest depth to increase, making the force required to pump air at that depth proportionally greater. The result is no net excess of energy, only equal to or less than unity.
7
T.M.W. A.S.
T.M.W. A.S.
4 years ago
Actualy no, as long as there are no holes for the water to enter, there is no reason for it to be harder to pump the air in. Let me entertain your belief there though, let’s say it does take more effort and energy because of the tube running down the water tank...
Well, just make one hole at the bottom where the pump is right there and pumps the air through that without being submerged in water, simple.
Can you tell me anything wrong with this new solution?
Alexei
Alexei
4 years ago
The matter is not in submerging the pump, the matter is that the pump is displacing the water that is under the pressure at the bottom. The the taller the reservoir the more pressure the pump has to overcome, simple.
2
T.M.W. A.S.
T.M.W. A.S.
4 years ago
what would it need to overcome? I get that there is more water pleasure at the bottom, but if you blow air into the bottom instead of blowing it in at the top, then it is not harder to blow the air in, the water pressure pushes down with the weight of all the water above it, but an air bubble rising is a natural thing, that wont be stopped by water pleasure, the pump just introduces the air into the tank without much force needed as the energy needed is just keeping the water from coming through the other direction. if an air bubble is at the bottom of the ocean, it does not sink from the water pleasure, it still rises because its lighter, and making an air tight seal in that pump is all that's needed to reduce the amount of effort needed.
[FSJ] Praetorian
[FSJ] Praetorian
3 years ago
Ignore the buoyancy of the bubble for a moment. Consider the case at the boundary of the water and air, where the air is being pumped in. If the air and water are in static equilibrium (i.e. Not moving) there is a static pressure necessary to maintain that equilibrium. That pressure is equivalent to the product of the density of the fluid, the gravitational constant, and the depth of the fluid at the point in question. (P = rho * g * h). Therefore, if the bubble is to be inserted at a greater depth, 'h' is increased, and the pressure required to maintain equilibrium (where the pump isn't flooded and the bubble isn't put into the tank) rises in proportion. This increase in pressure is also proportional to the energy necessary to pump the air. Therefore, an increase in depth cannot yield free energy, but only proportional, as at any other depth.
1
Fred Garvin
Fred Garvin
3 years ago
 @[FSJ] Praetorian  easy with the facts and science there buddy. people don't like being bothered with such things. they would much prefer to talk about the conspiracy the big oil companies have that keep them from making these machines to power their house.
1
wtf vids
wtf vids
3 years ago
 @Fred Garvin  Hydro killed both the trompe and ram pump. Two "free-energy" devices proven over thousands of years. If you want to live in Disney Land that is ok, but it is not reality.
Fred Garvin
Fred Garvin
3 years ago
 @wtf vids  ram pump can do no more work than the energy it gets from potential energy of water at a higher elevation.  

not what most people would consider a free energy device.
wtf vids
wtf vids
3 years ago
 @Fred Garvin  that why i said "free energy". Point is the industry bought up and killed the trompe and ram-pump all over the world.
Fred Garvin
Fred Garvin
3 years ago
 @wtf vids  whatever dude...

there is a reason why they use hydro-turbines to generate electricity from rivers and not ram pumps.  it isn't some conspiracy either.
CoSMinGYPS
CoSMinGYPS
11 months ago
@R13 WHAAAAAAt? Are you saying that this obviously bs thingy that makes the perpetual motion thingy with 200% efficiency is not physically possible? NO WAY MAN!
R13
R13
11 months ago
 @CoSMinGYPS  WHAAAAAt? Are you saying the obviously solar powered water cycle is not free energy?  NO WAY MAN!
wtf vids
wtf vids
11 months ago
 @CoSMinGYPS  "guess, what buddy"
CoSMinGYPS
CoSMinGYPS
11 months ago
 @R13  Right oooon, duuude!
CoSMinGYPS
CoSMinGYPS
11 months ago
 @wtf vids  love all the random broken English replies... The stupider the comment the more broken the English. It seems to be like a rule of nature: if(stupid==1){return broken_english;} else {goto normal_english;}



 Aldo Costa vs Eric Kaieg, The Bhaskara Cage
Jasze Rullez
137 subscribers
2,157 views  Nov 13, 2014
So...
 7 Comments
Piety Piet duh Pious Poet
Add a comment...
dalsenov
dalsenov
5 years ago
A wind mill in disguise.Up there,there is some wind,isn't it.?
uwe in Hamburg
uwe in Hamburg
4 years ago
Nothing like 'free' energy. Even if the laws of physics would not apply - how much did it cost to build ths thing? Time and material?
If the wheel would work like a wind mill, how much energy does it deliver?
Jack Smith
Jack Smith
6 years ago
the thing is turning. it works. why don't we use it?
1
Jasze Rullez
·
Thomas King
Thomas King
4 years ago
Costa himself admits this wheel must be pushed by hand to get going. Then it stops in three hours.  This info is easy to find, and comes from a BELIEVER in perpetual motion. The research isn't that hard. Easier than making this pointless video.